The Caribbean twin island state of Trinidad and Tobago is about to ban online and land-based gambling and has banned casino slot machines with almost immediate effect after Prime Minister Patrick Manning said they encouraged vice. Mr. Manning said at his recent budget proposal speech that gaming activities certainly are a'great concern'to the country. He announced he would also discontinue the Republic's national lottery and declared that slot machines and casinos were illegal with immediate effect.
It appears that, unlike the US, Mr. Manning does not have any intentions of supporting land based gambling activities, especially the state lottery, which in lots of countries is the source for billions of dollars worth of revenue every year to support the building and renovation of schools and other necessary state expenses. Countries such as the US and Germany could not afford to fund many state expenses in the interest of the citizens without their state lotteries for revenue income.
In the US, state lotteries in 38 states support the funding of new schools, institutional, and educational expenses and in Germany, the million euro state lotteries mostly fund the country's military expenditures. They're only a few examples.
No final date of implemetation was given for the Internet and online gambling ban by Mr. Manning. This development, which includes surprised many in the united states, comes just seven days after the U.S. passed legislation to prohibit US based players and gamblers from using credit cards, cheques and electronic transactions to cover and play at online gaming establishments mostly based outside of the US.
Even though the US has managed to get only illegal to transfer funds to online gambling sites, with yet the ultimate bill to ban online gambling in its entity still to undergo with George Bush's final approval and signature, and which is expected in just 2-3 weeks, the US has certainly not managed to get illegal to gamble on land. In effect, the US government is forcing its citizens to invest their hard-earned income on US land based gambling such as for instance race track, lotteries and brick and mortar land casinos https://waktutoto.net/.
Based on the US Government Code Section 8880.5 "the use of (state) lottery funds are limited by instructional purposes and states that"...no funds will be spent for...any other noninstructional purpose." Currently, the support budget of the California State University is represented by the four "Program" categories of INSTRUCTION, ACADEMIC SUPPORT, STUDENT SERVICES, and INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT. Lottery-funded instructional costs can best be defined as this program categories contained in INSTRUCTION, ACADEMIC SUPPORT and in very limited instances to INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT, simply because they represent costs most directly related to classroom instruction and system wide implementation costs ".
In the US state of Oregon, "Oregonians vote to approve the broad categories that'll receive Oregon Lottery funds, and have approved Constitutional amendments allowing Lottery funds to be useful for economic development (1984), public education (1995) and natural resource programs (1998). Then, every 2 yrs, Oregon's Legislature and Governor decide which specific programs and projects within those categories receive Lottery profits. During the biennium (2001-2003), almost 63% of Lottery profits, nearly $430 million were going to public education. The remaining visits economic development, parks and natural resources, and problem gambling treatment programs ".
38 US states all have and will continue to own state lotteries; mostly supporting various kinds of educational funding and where voters may also apply for funding via application to each state https://mpoline66.site/.
Mrs. Manning, the Minister of Education of Trinidad & Tobago and the wife of the Prime Minister Mr. Manning, seemingly have certainly not tried to own influenced the Prime Minister in his decision to prevent the state lottery as opposed to direct it towards the country's own educational and institutional funding purposes. Trinidad & Tobago has apparently only recently opened a brand new University of Trinidad & Tobago (UTT) which could have well made a lot more than sufficient usage of the state's lottery funds.
On further investigation of Trinidad & Tobago's state lottery system however, it was not clear that the state lottery supported any public funds as is typical in many countries which operate state lotteries as a way of revenue. In countries where state lotteries are regarded as meaningful revenue, citizens receive the democratic right to gamble, if only to support state institutions; in essence,'vice'is turned into'the good '. Through such methods, gamblers are liberated to participate in a'vice'by themselves responsibility whilst supporting state funding for much-needed education and state construction.
Currently, we has not had the opportunity to decipher if the Trinidad & Tobago state lottery was ever mandated to report on its income and what the funds from the lottery were directed to reach as a beneficial goal to the country's citizens.
The opposition party in Trinidad & Tobago, having already delivered its'a reaction to Mr. Manning's apparently shocking budget decision via Mrs. Kamla Persad-Bissessar, apparently didn't comment on the problem of the intent to make internet gambling illegal along with to prevent all land casinos, gambling for monies'paid to the house'and the state lottery from operating within the country.
Indeed, the Prime Minister is apparently on a hard line political drive to make it illegal for lots of the country's citizens to even gamble at their very own homes without question as to the true reasons why other countries, with particular focus on the US, may be moving so aggressively against online gambling.
Needless to say, Mr. Manning has appeared to own taken his cue from an apparent incorrect perception of the actual reasons why the US is presently cracking down on online and internet gambling (not house gambling); that is, essentially to help keep it's citizen's profit its own'house'along with all of the $12 billion dollars worth of yearly US dollars in profits which presently walk out the'house'door to foreign-based online gaming companies.
Such a political move which the US has implemented has been criticized by many worldwide and in the US, to be fundamentally non-democratic and even socialist.
Many, including Americans, are starting to ask themselves the question of what the Republicans would request of US citizens next; perhaps forbidding them to drink alcohol or to invest their hard-earned money for'foreign'holidays on'local'soil. Mr. Manning, along with his Budget speech, also delivered his intentions to improve serious taxes on smoking and alcohol products https://tikviralme.com/.
What with these new world developments, one is reminded in uncanny fashion of Adolf Hitler's methods to encourage the German people to promote healthy lifestyles, engage heavily in sports, non-alcoholic consumption and to not partake in all types of'vice'which affect the human body and mind and prevented one from becoming the'perfect race '. Hitler also encouraged his citizens to invest holidays on German territory and the like.
Many also expect that political moves such as the complete banning of state lotteries will further encourage governments to have their money from other sources because they are suddenly unable to earn sufficient revenue from its citizen's activities, and are therefore far prone to acquire much-needed funds through more illegal channels. In effect, as we have read on one site "such moves can lead to more state-controlled white washing of criminal money ".
It generally does not take much good sense to know that smoking in open areas on beaches, in parks and in cities much polluted by continuous industrial activity is far less likely to harm the collective health of US citizens whilst the US government simultaneously moves to lessen or annihilate the much-needed political pressure on oil, gas and industrial companies to finally assume responsibility and finally and literally, pay the expenses of clearing up their immediate environmental pollution.
It does seem, however unintentional, that the politics of some countries seem to create and move more criminal activity in to the forefront than foster new opportunities, desperately needed revenue and a basic freedom of choice in the interest of the public and the citizenry of the countries.